Women's (Disability) History Month: Barbara Jordan

Barbara Jordan, the former congresswoman from Texas, was born and raised in Houston, Texas. After graduating from Texas Southern University, she attended law school at Boston University before returning to Houston. In 1966, she became the first African-American woman to serve in the Texas state senate, where she did until her election to the U.S. House Representatives in 1972. At the time, Jordan was the first African-American woman from a southern state to serve in Congress. She quickly made a name for herself on the national stage by securing a seat on the Judiciary Committee and is most famous for her impassioned defense of the Constitution during Richard Nixon’s impeachment.

In the 1973, Jordan was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. She began walking with a cane and eventually progressed to a wheelchair. She left Congress in January 1979 and returned to Texas as a full professor at the University of Texas. Jordan continued to be involved in politics and among other things, she spoke at the 1988 and 1992 Democratic National Conventions. Many people found it shocking that:

Her 1992 keynote address was delivered from a wheelchair while she was in the midst of a lengthy battle with multiple sclerosis.

While her congressional biographies say, “She never married and carefully guarded her private life”, she supposedlyhad “a longtime companion”, Nancy Earl. Barbara Jordan died from complications of pneumonia and leukemia on January 17, 1996.

Read more:

  • African-American Voices in Congress: Barbara Jordan
  • About.com: Women’s History-Barbara Jordan
  • U.S. Congress: Barbara Jordan
  • Black Americans in Congress: Barbara Jordan
  • Photo credit: Library of Congress

    ##

    Share

    Feminists Give Thanks

    What are feminists thankful for this year, besides turkey, stuffing and fabulous shoes? A few friends and I got together and took stock of our cornucopia of blessings, thanks to the hard work of many who have come before us. Read as these fab feminists give thanks and take time to reflect on how you have benefited from feminism. Feel free to leave a comment!

    The Undomestic Goddess:

    In an imperfect world where there’s still much hate, and at a time in our nation where we’re very much divided, I can still be thankful for the overwhelming amount of people who do good, and who mobilize to protect the rights of other human beings. I’m also thankful for Twitter, for connecting me with some pretty fabulous feminists, and for teaching me that I’m not alone.

    DancingGrapes (the consequences of a naked foot):

    I’m thankful for strong women. Women that raised me, those I work with, women that inspire me every day. There’s something about the company of women that goes so beyond the pragmatic. I’m so thankful every time I’m in the presence of magnificent women.

    Shelby Knox:

    In 1972, Pat Schroeder was elected to Congress from a Denver district and given a coveted seat on the Armed Services Committee. This so peeved Chairman F. Edward Hébert, who was in his 31st year in Congress and a vehement opponent of desegregation, that he ordered the freshman Congresswoman and a black second-term member to literally share a chair because each was worth half a “regular” member. In 2008, Senator Hillary Clinton logged those 16 million votes for the presidency and Barack Obama currently sits in the White House.

    I’m grateful to the women and men who paved the way for young men of color and women of all hues to imagine ourselves as “Congressman” or “Governor” or “Madame President.” Victoria WoodhullFrederick Douglass. Jeannette Rankin. Shirley ChisholmPatsy Mink. Carol Moseley-Braun. Wilma Mankiller. (And many more whose names we’ve forgotten but on whose shoulders we stand.)

    And yes, I’m even grateful this blessing extends to one rogue former Alaska governor. In the words of Bella Abzug, a woman to whom we all owe a debt of gratitude, “Women have been and are prejudiced, narrow-minded, reactionary, even violent. Some women. They, of course, have a right to vote and a right to run for office. I will defend that right, but I will not support them or vote for them.”

    As for me….

    I am thankful for all the women who paved the way for me to get a degree in computer science. I am thankful to Sally Ride and Christa McAuliffe for being two high profile female astronauts and scientists during my formative years.

    I am thankful to Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman for being CEOs at HP and eBay, respectively, while I was in college, proving that women can break the glass ceiling in the IT world. (Why do they have to be Republican? Argh.)

    I am thankful to the AAUW for their work in increasing the number of women and girls in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM).

    Most of all, I am thankful to Anita Borg, who started the Systers email list for women in computer science and technology. Without Systers and the knowledge that there were thousands of other smart, savvy technical women out there, I would never have made it through college.

    Thank you!

    Share

    Saturday Link-Love

    Happy Halloween! Hope your Saturday is treating you well. Here are a few of the week’s best links:

    First, a little horn-tootin’. I am humbled and honored to be included on this list of 50 Eye-Opening Women’s Studies Blogs, along with some of the great feminist blogs on this list. Check it out!

    Ashley at the Small Strokes blog has a new project: This is What a Beautiful Bride Looks Like, which features pictures of real brides. Here’s a description of the site, in Ashley’s own words:

    As an engaged woman who loves her body, I am sick and tired of seeing ads for “Wedding Weightloss” routines and images of 100% “perfect,” unattainable brides! Here, I hope to collect some pictures of brides with REAL beauty! To submit a photo, e-mail samsanator(at)gmail(dot)com

    On Thursday, I participated in a Conference Call with Rep. Cynthis Lummis (R-WY). BlogHer has now posted the full transcript of the event, including my Q&A with the congresswoman.

    Finally, here’s a little Halloween fun for ya. The fab team at Bitch Media has put together an awesome list of Feminist Halloween Costumes. I love the idea of going as one of Jem and the Holograms.

    Share

    Conference Call with Rep. Cynthia Lummis

    This morning I did yet another BlogHer conference call on health care reform. This one was with Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY). Did you catch the “R” after her name? Yep, she’s a Republican and vehemently opposed to “The Speaker’s Bill” as she put it. I’ll do a quick recap of the call, but long story short, there’s not a snowball’s chance in you-know-where that Congresswoman Lummis will vote “aye” on the Affordable Health Care for America Act.

    At the beginning of the call, Rep. Lummis told Republicans are in favor of health care reform. They would just do it differently. She said she didn’t know what the rush was and that Republicans want to “borrow the best of the bills” to reform the system one step at a time. She also said the current health care system services 85% of Americans “very well” so we should focus our energy on trying to help the other 15%.

    Rep. Lummis’ proposals for piecemeal reform including high-risk insurance pools that are (supposedly) available in every state. She also wants to establish a tax credit so individuals can buy private insurance policies that would be portable even if they lost their job. Her third idea was to allow consumers to buy insurance policies across state lines.

    Rep. Lummis said she was “terribly concerned” about “The Speaker’s Bill” (doesn’t it sound evil?) because it shifts many costs to the states by expanding Medicare.” That’s a direct quote. (Hence the quotation marks.) I’m pretty sure she meant to say “Medicaid” as the bill does expand Medicaid. Nothing recent is coming up on Google for “expand Medicare”.

    Here are the calls:

    • Loralee, of the LooneyTunes blog, asked Rep. Lummis to elaborate on her ideas for expanding the high-risk pools. The congresswoman told Loralee she is co-sponsoring HR 3400, which would provide more funding for high-risk pools so individuals could buy into the plans at a lower rate. This would be paid for with unused stimulus funds (which apparently aren’t needed for any of the bridges that are falling down.)
    • Jaelithe, a blogger for MOMocrats.com, told Rep. Lummis “there is a rush” for health care reform. People like her step-father, who has diabetes, are going without health insurance and life-saving medicine, such as insulin. (Which is kind of important to diabetics). Jaelithe asked Rep. Lummis if there was anything explicitly prohibiting insurers from discriminating against people with pre-existing conditions in HR 3400, her go-to bill. To my recollection, Rep. Lummis didn’t really answer that. Instead, she told Jaelithe her step-father could join the high-risk pool in his state. What Rep. Lummis apparently doesn’t know is that high-risk pools are still pretty darn expensive for the average citizen, especially if you’re poor.
    • Nancy from the Sunlight Foundation asked how Rep. Lummis felt about transparency, at which point, I mentally blocked out so I could figure out what question I wanted to ask
    • Next up, Yours Truly: I was really emotional so I’m sure this came out crazy and incoherent but I told Rep. Lummis that I have a rare medical condition and that I am on SSI/Medicaid. I don’t want to be on disability because honestly, it’s demonized. I know I said that twice. (The shaming of people on disability, Medicaid and other “entitlement” programs is a post for another day.) I told her I want to get off those programs very badly and am working towards self-employment but I need affordable health insurance. I need health care reform. With all due respect, the only way that’s going to happen this year is with the Democrats’ plan. I asked her if there was any way she could support the Democrats’ billWithout taking a breath, Rep. Lummis did not answer my question. Well, actually, she did – by not answering it.

      She started immediately listing her Republican talking points about how they would do health care reform: tax credits, high-risk pools and let people buy insurance across state lines. I actually started rolling my eyes while she was talking. She never once said anything about how she could work to find a compromise with the Democrats which means she can’t. Or won’t.

      Also, Rep. Lummis basically told me not to apologize for being on Medicaid and that I was the reason the system was there. I had nothing to be ashamed or guilty about. However, seconds later, she told me both Medicare and Medicaid are going broke and we are saddling our children and grandchildren with back-breaking debt.How am I not supposed to feel guilty about that debt every time I go to the doctor or receive my monthly check via direct deposit? Or how about when Sen. Judd Gregg goes on MSNBC and basically pitches a fit about how health care reform is another entitlement program that will bankrupt future generations, like he did less than an hour before I spoke to Rep. Lummis?

      Needless to say, I was not impressed with Rep. Lummis.

    • I was, however, very impressed with Erin Kotecki Vest who some of you may know as @QueenOfSpain on Twitter. Erin asked Rep. Lummis if she was in favor of expanding Medicare and Medicaid after listening to talk about how wonderful she thought Medicaid was for people like me (more on that in a moment). Rep. Lummis said she was glad I was able to take advantage of Medicaid but said it would be “inaccurate” to say she supports the program as it is. “I’m glad that the safety net is there for the last caller,” she told Erin, referring to me. Still, she said she is an advocate for reforming Medicare. “We must ferret out waste, fraud and abuse.”

    Can we please ferret the Republicans out of this debate? I appreciate the bipartisanship that the Sunlight Foundation and Blogher tried to introduce to this conversation but at this point, isn’t the GOP irrelevant? I want to pretend they are, at least, because John McCain and Lindsey Graham’s influence on Joe Lieberman is driving me up the freakin’ wall. If this health care house of cards comes falling down because Joe Lieberman, who was elected vice-president of the United States by the majority of the people in this country in 2000, decides to kill it, I just don’t know what I’ll do.

    I just don’t.

    UPDATED: 6:09 PM CST

    For the record, in case that statement about “what I’ll do” if Joe Lieberman filibusters health care reform sounded weird or could in any way be construed as threatening, let me be clear: The only thing I’ll do is say bad words when no one’s listening so I can pretend I’m still a lady. Or I’ll engage in grassroots lobbying by emailing, faxing and telling my story. Nothing else. Yep, I’m kinda paranoid that anything I write online is considered published and could be traced back to me someday so there. I’ve covered my butt.

    Share

    My Conference Call with Nancy Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi in her place as Speaker of the House

    This morning, I was lucky enough to participate in a BlogHer conference call with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. The topic was health care reform and Speaker Pelosi had plenty to say.

    In her opening remarks, Ms. Pelosi expressed optimism that health care reform legislation will get passed. “I’m very enthusiastic about where we are on this legislation,” she said. She said women have much to gain from health care reform:

    • Insurance companies won’t be able to charge women more than men. (Women currently pay as much as 48% more)
    • It will be illegal to count pregnancy, C-sections and domestic violence as pre-existing conditions.
    • Insurance companies who participate in the health insurance exchange will be required to have maternity care. (It’s unclear to me if all insurance companies will be required to do so.)
    • There will be assistance to individuals and families who earn up to 400% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) to help buy health insurance.

    The first question came from Audrey in Maine, who said her family was facing foreclosure on their home due to huge medical bills. Audrey asked if it was really possible that insurance premiums wouldn’t go up for people in private plans?

    Ms. Pelosi explained that there were several provisions in the House bill for Audrey’s situation. There will be no discrimination for pre-existing conditions. Insurance companies couldn’t drop coverage if you get sick. There will be no co-pays for prevention and wellness. There will be yearly and lifetime caps on what you pay out of pocket. If you have a disability or chronic medical condition like Audrey, there will be a cap on what you pay. Ms. Pelosi told Audrey that her case is exactly why the current system needs reform.

    The next question came from a woman in Chicago, who happened to be waiting at the DMV. (I didn’t catch her name, sorry DMV lady!) The caller was extremely concerned about the expansion of government into the health care system. “It strikes fear in my heart,” she said, asking Ms. Pelosi to help calm her fears. “We are not doling out health care. We are helping people pay for health insurance,” Ms. Pelosi replied. Ms. Pelosi went on to say that health care reform would be paid for by reducing fraud and waste in the current system. She also insisted the public option has to pay for itself and be “actuarial sound,” which I freely admit is an accounting term that’s way over my head.

    Heather from Los Angeles, who has a blood clotting disorder that makes her pregnancies high-risk, asked if there would be any “gray area” on pre-existing conditions. Absolutely not, Ms. Pelosi replied. “There can be no discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions.” She reiterated that all insurance companies who want to participate in the insurance exchange will be required to have maternity care and that insurance companies will want to operate in the exchange because they will have access to millions of new customers.

    On the issue of pre-existing conditions, Ms. Pelosi expressed disbelief and disgust at the discrimination women face by insurance companies. “Can you believe that C-sections and domestic violence are pre-existing conditions?” she asked, incredulously.

    A caller from St. Louis asked about the proposed cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. Ms. Pelosi said they were going to eliminate the waste, fraud and abuse” in Medicare and Medicaid. She said these efficiencies would extend Medicare solvency by another five years. She quoted the AARP as saying the changes to Medicare would make Medicare more efficient.

    Throughout the call, Ms. Pelosi talked about the proposed health insurance exchange. “Reform must take place in the exchange… A public option should be in the exchange.” There will be assistance for individuals (and families, I think) making up to 400% FPL and small businesses to purchase health insurance through the exchange.

    After nearly every caller, Ms. Pelosi said, “Keep watching what we’re doing. Hold us accountable.” She said the final House bill she be done within a week or two. It will be posted online at least 72 hours before debate begins on the House floor so look for that.

    This was a great opportunity to be a part of this conference call so thank you, BlogHer!

    Note: This was written off my notes from the conference call. Actual quotes on the transcript on Blogher.com may be slightly different.

    Share