
The Undomestic Goddess sent me this Jezebel link via Twitter: In Which Disabled Women Get Makeovers.
In the UK, there’s a new version of a popular makeover show: How to Look Good Naked…With a Difference. The “difference?” All the women on this series are disabled in some way:
You’re probably familiar with the How to Look Good Naked franchise (in the U.S. it’s hosted by former QueerEye fashion maven Carson Kressley) in which women, through a course of pampering, self-esteem exercises, talks with the host and makeovers, learn to feel good in their own skins. It’s a gentler twist on a genre that spawned such horrors as The Swan and Extreme Makeover, and its British iteration, hosted by Gok Wan, is a hit on the other side of the pond.
Yeah.
I’ve never seen How to Look Good Naked, even the Kressley version, so I don’t really know how to works. I don’t know if they include any plastic surgery or if it’s just hair, makeup, exercise, diet, clothes, etc. You know, the whole “you look terrible, you dress terribly, you eat terribly, your hair and makeup is terrible and you’re basically a terrible failure as a human being” king of makeover show where a benevolent fairy godperson swoops in to save the pathetic peon from her ugly existence.
Obviously, there are many problems with this type of reality makeover show, most of which I’ll leave to Jenn Pozner. The more immediate issues is why women with disabilities were singled out for a “special” episodes. More from Jezebel:
Why do these women need their own show? HTLGN is about making women feel good – all women, right? Not just the able-bodied. Those who for, whatever reason, need a boost. Not all disabled women feel unattractive; these few do. And while it’s clearly a very positive experience for all involved, isolating the episode creates the usual danger of letting the few represent a large and varied population. Why not have disabled women mixed into regular seasons occasionally, like anyone else? Especially given the practical tips Wan disseminates.
Singling out disabled women for this “special” program speaks to the larger issue of our society’s unfamiliarity and discomfort with disabilities, particularly with women’s disabilities. While this television program is currently airing only in the U.K., I think we can all easily envision a similar program on this side of the pond so I don’t hesitate to lump “our” Western society together.
Quick: Name some famous women with disabilities. I thought about this for a couple minutes and came up with Helen Keller and actress Marlee Matlin. Now try and think of some famous men with disabilities. Mine were FDR, Christopher Reeve, Corky from “Life Goes on” (yes, I’m that old), Perry Mason, Richard Dreyfuss’ kid in the movie Mr. Holland’s Opus (fictional example but oh well), Lieutenant Dan from Forrest Gump, Perry Mason, President Reagan’s press secretary James Brady, and on and on and on.
I don’t know why I can think of so many male figures with disabilities. As a society, we’re pretty comfortable with men’s disabilities. We see them as masculine, especially when the disability is a result of combat, sports or motor vehicle accident. When a man is injured on the battle field or thrown from his motorcycle at 80 miles an hour, we feel bad but it happens to lots of men. It’s “manly”. In many ways, their disability is a badge of honor and courage.
Women’s disabilities are different.
We don’t talk about women’s disabilities. We aren’t comfortable with them. I don’t know if this is because we are supposed to be the mothers and caretakers of society who every one else depends on to be strong. It may be because we have been taught over and over again that our bodies are shameful and indecent so if there is something “broken” or “dis”-abled about it, then we as women should buck up and just handle it by ourselves. We shouldn’t talk about it.
We need to talk about women and disabilities. We need to remove the stigma, fear and isolation associated with women and disabilities. For instance, when I think about a man using a cane, I think of a kind, grandfatherly type smiling at me as I walk into Walmart. When I think of a woman using a cane, I think of the witch in Snow White or the hag Hogatha from the Smurfs, although I cannot find any pictures of either actually using a cane or walking stick. I’m not sure if that means they didn’t use one but in any case, my image of women and canes is not positive. It is of mean old ladies with multiple health issues who want to harm others. That’s not exactly empowering.
Furthermore, women need to talk more openly about our bodies and our health. I will never forget listening to Sen. Chris Dodd talk about his prostate surgery at Ted Kennedy’s memorial service last summer. Dodd told the audience how Kennedy had called him shortly after his surgery and said they had shared a few jokes about catheters. Sen. Dodd talked about catheters for urination after prostate surgery at a nationally televised event. I simply cannot imagine two female survivors of breast cancer joking about their drains after a mastectomy at a similar event. Or a mastectomy bra. Or even just mammograms.
If we talked about our bodies and our health more, if we were more open about our health, illnesses, self-image and disabilities, what would that mean? Would conversations like this happen? Would we have more empathy for people who are different from us? We would be so scared of becoming sick and/or disabled?
Would we need ‘special’ makeover shows for women with disabilities? Of course not. If we, as a society, could begin to talk about women’s bodies in a healthy, respectful and nurturing way, every woman would be able to seek and find information on beauty, fashion, health, and wellness to meet her needs without a makeover show perpetuating condescending stereotypes.
**